Wednesday, 28 February 2007
Knowledge Management and Law Libraries

Bruce MacEwen talks about the “Law Library of the Future” at Adam Smith, Esq. Bruce has an interesting characterization of the attitudes of four generations of lawyers regarding media, technology, and research. He concludes:
Ultimately, I believe the law library of the future is Knowledge Management. If I'm right, this is terrific news for librarians who can adapt themselves to this role and ensure that the conversation with the executive committee about resource allocation is cast in terms of scholarship, professional development, client and business intelligence, and competitive advantage through astutely marshalling the firm's intellectual assets: And not in terms of overhead, square footage, the price of subscriptions, headcount, and non-fee-earners.
If so, the library of the future will evolve:
from a tactical to a strategic resource from static repository to dynamic, on-demand portal from one-way delivery of assets to home for communities of practice, and from a "one size fits all" commodity to an adaptive resource tailored to the needs of your firm today.
Law libraries are definitely changing and, as a lawyer who has created a practice based on the availability of online legal research resources, I like the change. Bruce is right that it is all about “knowledge management.” No matter how easily accessible knowledge may seem to be, there will always be a need for those who know how to find it. That said, there is still something wonderful and inspring about a traditional library and those rows and stacks of books.

Posted on 8:27 AM by susan

Thursday, 8 February 2007
Citations to Wikipedia -- when are they appropriate?
If you read legal blogs at all, you have probably seen the recent posts about citations to Wikipedia in judicial opinions and law journal articles. Daniel J. Solove at Concurring Opinions asks the next question – when is citation to Wikipedia appropriate? He gives ten examples of citations to Wikipedia and asks for comments on whether the citations are appropriate and why. It will be interesting to follow the comments.
Posted on 7:23 AM by susan
Wednesday, 7 February 2007
Online Court Dockets and Documents
The Legal Dockets Online Blog lists the court dockets that are not available using CM/ECF. The list is especially helpful because it identifies alternative means to obtain dockets and documents.
Posted on 5:47 AM by susan
Wednesday, 7 February 2007
Asshole Test
Posted on 5:48 AM by susan
Monday, 5 February 2007
Multi-State Legal Research Resources
Posted on 8:37 AM by susan
Saturday, 3 February 2007
Word Origins -- Lobbyist
World Wide Words discusses the origin of the word “lobbyist.” Like most people, I always though it had something to do with meeting with politicians in lobbies of hotels, probably originating with President Grant and the Willard Hotel. Wrong. According to Michael Quinion, the word was used long before Grant’s presidency.
The OED’s first example of the collective term lobby meaning “persons who frequent the lobby of the house of legislature for the purpose of influencing its members in their official action” is dated 1808.
The original lobby was the one attached to the chamber of the British House of Commons, in which members could meet and talk to outsiders. This sense (and function) is recorded from the middle of the seventeenth century and was adopted in Congress when it was established more than a century later.
FYI.
Posted on 7:14 PM by Susan

Friday, 2 February 2007
Further and Farther -- Grammar Tips
I think that Grammar Girl can read my mind. This week she (or rather her surrogate, Legal Lad) addresses the distinction between “further” and “farther.” “The quick and dirty tip here is that you use farther to talk about physical distance and further to talk about metaphorical, or figurative, distance. It's easy to remember because farther has the word far in it, and far obviously relates to physical distance.” But listen/read Grammar Girl here and get more tips about how to distinguish these terms. Then you can impress your friends and colleagues when you correct them. (If you are really tempted to correct someone's grammar, please listen to Grammar Girl's tips here.)
Posted on 5:54 AM by susan
Thursday, 1 February 2007
Supreme Court Reality?
Concurring Opinions has a great idea for a reality television show based on the Supreme Court. I am not a fan of those shows, but I sure would watch this one.
Posted on 6:31 AM by Susan
Thursday, 1 February 2007
Active and Passive and Grammar & Style Check
More on passive vs. active. As I and many other bloggers have noted, the condemnation of passive voice has tempered somewhat and most agree that active voice is not always best. Lynn Gaertner-Johnson at Business Writing points out that Microsoft Word can help identify passive voice in your writing. Simply change the grammar check option to “grammar and style” rather than “grammar only.” Then Word will alert you to the passive voice just as it alerts you to sentence fragments and misspellings.
Posted on 6:34 AM by susan
Thursday, 1 February 2007
Thoughtful and Thoughtless Writing
Legal Literacy has 12 rules for avoiding smoking guns. Following these rules is probably good advice for any reason. In another post, Legal Literacy gives a thoughtful quote on how e-mail can often be so thoughtless:
While on the one hand e-mail encourages people to write, on the other hand it discourages people to write thoughtfully.
Mary Mitchell, author of The Complete Idiot’s Guide to Etiquette as quoted in “‘Yours Truly,’ the E-Variations,” New York Times, Nov. 26, 2006.
Posted on 6:36 AM by susan
|